trapdoor-channel-without-feedback

Trapdoor channel without feedback

Removing output feedback from the same binary finite-state trapdoor channel leaves its exact feedforward capacity unresolved.

Point-to-point Finite alphabet Binary Memory Capacity Bounds only

Channel and question

Input
A binary symbol inserted into a box already containing one binary state symbol.
Output
One of the two symbols is selected uniformly as output; the other becomes the next state.
Law
The same trapdoor state transition as the feedback entry, but the encoder observes no channel outputs.
Quantity
Feedforward capacity \(C\), measured in bits per channel use.

Criterion. Nonfeedback encoding over arbitrary blocklengths.

  • The initial state is fixed and known.
  • Average decoding error vanishes.

Current status

\[0\le C\le1\]

The exact value is not identified with the solved feedback capacity.

ResultRelationMethodYear
Upper\(C\le1\)Binary input alphabet bound.2006
Lower\(C\ge0\)One-message code.2006

Research frontier

Determine the exact capacity without encoder access to past outputs.

Why it remains open. Channel state depends on the unobserved output history and creates input-dependent memory.

What would count as progress

  • Improve finite-state achievability and converse bounds under a fixed initial-state convention.

Concrete tasks

  • doneKeep the solved feedback capacity as a separate operational statement.

Lean formalization

Canonical statementStatement

Version 1 · Lean. A separate feedforward operational interface prevents accidental reuse of the feedback theorem.

Substantial proofs0 linked

No external Lean proof is registered. Proofs longer than roughly 50 lines or requiring problem-specific infrastructure should live in a dedicated repository and link back to this statement version.

References

  1. Haim H. Permuter, Paul Cuff, Benjamin Van Roy, and Tsachy Weissman (2006). Capacity of the Trapdoor Channel with Feedback. arXiv preprint.

Discussion

Thread key: capacityatlas:trapdoor-channel-without-feedback

Related problems

Each input bit is independently deleted without an erasure marker; the exact capacity is unknown for every nontrivial deletion probability.

Point-to-point Binary Finite alphabet Memory Deletion Capacity Bounds only
Open \(0.1221(1-d)<C_{\mathrm{del}}(d)\le0.3578(1-d)\)

In the fixed iid random-insertion model, each transmitted bit may be followed by one independent fair inserted bit and exact capacity is unknown.

Point-to-point Finite alphabet Binary Memory Capacity Bounds only
Open \(0\le C_{\mathrm{ins}}(p)\le1\)
Binary Z-channel Z-channel

One binary symbol is transmitted perfectly while the other can flip in only one direction.

Point-to-point Binary Finite alphabet Discrete memoryless Asymmetric Capacity Exact
Solved \(C_Z(p)=\log_2\!\left(1+(1-p)p^{p/(1-p)}\right)\)

Each transmitted bit is received correctly or replaced by a visible erasure symbol.

Point-to-point Binary Finite alphabet Discrete memoryless Symmetric Erasure Capacity Exact
Solved \(C_{\mathrm{BEC}}(\varepsilon)=1-\varepsilon\)