trapdoor-channel-without-feedback

Trapdoor channel without feedback

The binary trapdoor channel’s exact capacity without feedback remains unknown.

Point-to-point Finite alphabet Binary Memory Capacity Bounds only

Channel and question

Input
A binary symbol inserted into a box already containing one binary state symbol.
Output
One of the two symbols is selected uniformly as output; the other becomes the next state.
Law
The same trapdoor state transition as the feedback entry, but the encoder observes no channel outputs.
Quantity
Feedforward capacity \(C\), measured in bits per channel use.

Criterion. Nonfeedback encoding over arbitrary blocklengths.

  • The initial state is fixed and known.
  • Average decoding error vanishes.

Current status

\[0.572\le C\le0.5765\]

Both endpoints are reported numerical bounds rather than exact symbolic constants; the exact feedforward capacity remains open.

Known results and bounds for Trapdoor channel without feedback
ResultRelationMethodYear
Lower\(C\ge0.572\)Finite-block Blahut-Arimoto maximization using recursive trapdoor-channel matrices.The reported decimal is extrapolated from computations through blocklength 10.2003
Upper\(C\le\log_2(3/2)\)Q-graph dual capacity bound with an analytic Bellman-equation solution.2021
Upper\(C\le0.5765\)The initial state is known to the encoder and decoder; delayed feedback upper-bounds feedforward capacity.Four-step delayed-feedback Q-graph converse evaluated by convex optimization.The source reports this rounded value from computer-based simulations, not as an exact analytic endpoint.2024
Lower\(1/2\le C\)Repeat each message bit twice. With known entering state, each output pair determines the input bit and leaving state.The source introduction records the zero-error value 1/2 and credits earlier work. Only this analytic lower bound is selected, not 0.572.2006

Open question

Determine the exact capacity without encoder access to past outputs.

Channel state depends on the unobserved output history and creates input-dependent memory.

Improve finite-state achievability and converse bounds under a fixed initial-state convention.

Tasks

Formal verification

Lean coverageFormally stated

New statements await mathematical review and proofs. The admitted analytic claim uses 1/2 and log2(3/2). The separately displayed 0.572 and 0.5765 numerical endpoints are not certified by this claim.

Claims

  • Analytic no-feedback bounds. Rounded or extrapolated numerical endpoints are not asserted.
    analytic-capacity-bounds · capacity bounds · solved · Formally stated · v2
  • Independently tracked repetition achievability.
    repetition-achievability · achievability · solved · Formally stated · v1
  • Independently tracked analytic converse.
    analytic-converse · converse · solved · Formally stated · v1
Lean declarations (4)

References

  1. Haim H. Permuter, Paul Cuff, Benjamin Van Roy, and Tsachy Weissman (2006). Capacity of the Trapdoor Channel with Feedback. arXiv preprint.
  2. Kingo Kobayashi, Hiroyoshi Morita, and Mamoru Hoshi (2003). Some Considerations on the Trapdoor Channel. Proceedings of the 3rd Asian-European Workshop on Information Theory.
  3. Kingo Kobayashi (2006). Capacity Problem of Trapdoor Channel. General Theory of Information Transfer and Combinatorics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4123. DOI 10.1007/11889342_76.
  4. Bashar Huleihel, Oron Sabag, Haim H. Permuter, Navin Kashyap, and Shlomo Shamai (2021). Computable Upper Bounds on the Capacity of Finite-State Channels. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. DOI 10.1109/TIT.2021.3091691.
  5. Bashar Huleihel, Oron Sabag, Haim H. Permuter, and Victoria Kostina (2024). Capacity of Finite-State Channels With Delayed Feedback. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. DOI 10.1109/TIT.2023.3304408.

Discussion

Related problems

Each input bit is independently deleted without an erasure marker; the exact capacity is unknown for every nontrivial deletion probability.

Point-to-point Binary Finite alphabet Memory Deletion Capacity Bounds only
Open \(0.1221(1-d)<C_{\mathrm{del}}(d)\le0.3578(1-d)\)

In the fixed iid random-insertion model, each transmitted bit may be followed by one independent fair inserted bit and exact capacity is unknown.

Point-to-point Finite alphabet Binary Memory Capacity Bounds only
Open \(0\le C_{\mathrm{ins}}(p)\le1\)
Binary Z-channel Z-channel

One binary symbol is transmitted perfectly while the other can flip in only one direction.

Point-to-point Binary Finite alphabet Discrete memoryless Asymmetric Capacity Exact
Solved \(C_Z(p)=\log_2\!\left(1+(1-p)p^{p/(1-p)}\right)\)

Each transmitted bit is received correctly or replaced by a visible erasure symbol.

Point-to-point Binary Finite alphabet Discrete memoryless Symmetric Erasure Capacity Exact
Solved \(C_{\mathrm{BEC}}(\varepsilon)=1-\varepsilon\)