gaussian-wiretap-channel

Degraded Gaussian wiretap channel

A Gaussian receiver has a lower noise variance than the eavesdropper, yielding a closed-form secrecy capacity.

Wiretap Continuous alphabet Gaussian Degraded Secrecy Power constraint Secrecy capacity Exact

Channel and question

Input
\(X\in\mathbb R\) with average power \(P\).
Output
\(Y=X+N_1\) and \(Z=X+N_2\).
Law
Gaussian noise variances satisfy \(\sigma_1^2<\sigma_2^2\).
Quantity
Secrecy capacity \(C_s\), measured in secret bits per channel use.

Criterion. Strong-secrecy capacity with the per-message-and-seed block-power constraint stated above.

  • The eavesdropper channel is degraded.
  • For every message m and every private seed s, sum_t x_t(m,s)^2 <= n P. This constraint is not averaged over the message or the seed.
  • The finite private seed is uniform and independent of the uniform message.
  • Strong secrecy means unnormalized I(M;Z^n) tends to zero, simultaneously with legitimate average decoding error.

Current status

\[C_s=\frac12\log_2\!\left(1+\frac{P}{\sigma_1^2}\right)-\frac12\log_2\!\left(1+\frac{P}{\sigma_2^2}\right)\]
Known results and bounds for Degraded Gaussian wiretap channel
ResultRelationMethodYear
Lower\(C_s\ge C(\sigma_1^2)-C(\sigma_2^2)\)Gaussian stochastic encoding and binning.1978
Upper\(C_s\le C(\sigma_1^2)-C(\sigma_2^2)\)Degraded secrecy converse and Gaussian extremality.1978

Formal verification

Lean coverageFormally stated

Concrete operational definitions and admitted research statements are present. Existing proofs are preserved. New statements require mathematical review and proof completion. Power convention: MessageSeedPowerAdmissible. No equivalence to another power convention is assumed.

Claims

  • Degraded Gaussian strong-secrecy capacity with private finite randomization.
    operational-capacity · exact capacity · solved · Formally stated · v1
Lean declarations (1)

References

  1. S. K. Leung-Yan-Cheong and Martin E. Hellman (1978). The Gaussian Wire-Tap Channel. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. DOI 10.1109/TIT.1978.1055917.

Discussion

Related problems

A sender communicates reliably to a legitimate receiver while hiding the message from a degraded eavesdropper.

Wiretap Finite alphabet Discrete memoryless Degraded Secrecy Secrecy capacity Exact Single-letter characterization
Solved \(C_s=\max_{P_X}\bigl[I(X;Y)-I(X;Z)\bigr]\)

The unconstrained finite wiretap channel has a single-auxiliary secrecy-capacity characterization without a degradedness assumption.

Wiretap Finite alphabet Discrete memoryless Secrecy Secrecy capacity Exact Single-letter characterization
Solved \(C_s=\max_{V-X-(Y,Z)}\bigl[I(V;Y)-I(V;Z)\bigr]\)

Noiseless output feedback improves reliability without changing AWGN capacity.

Point-to-point Continuous alphabet Gaussian Additive noise Feedback Power constraint Capacity Exact
Solved \(C_{\mathrm{AWGN,fb}}=\frac12\log_2\!\left(1+\frac PN\right)\)